EDITOR ’ S QUESTION
AI regulations may also bring the spotlight on certain areas of law that were always very relevant to the web scraping industry , such as privacy or copyright laws . At the end of the day , scraping content protected by such laws without proper authorization could always lead to legal issues , and now so can using AI this way .
Over the last few years , many cases involving AI have been widely covered in the media . Which would you say are potentially the most impactful ?
Perhaps the most widely covered cases involving AI have been the lawsuits against GenAI models . Owners of such models , like OpenAI and its main investor , Microsoft , were sued by numerous authors , artists and musicians , alleging that their copyrights were infringed via the models being trained using their original works without permission . These cases are pivotal in determining the legal boundaries of using copyrighted material for AI development and establishing legal precedents for protecting intellectual property in the digital age .
What can businesses do now to prepare for the future – given that such cases can take years to come to a conclusion and become a precedent ?
Speaking about the specific cases of using copyrighted material for AI training , businesses should approach this the same way as any web-scraping activity – that is , evaluate the specific data they wish to collect with the help of a legal expert in the field .
As for AI governance in general , it is important to recognize that the AI legal landscape is very new and rapidly evolving , with not many precedents in place to refer to as of yet . Hence , continuous monitoring and adaptation of your AI usage are crucial . p
www . intelligentcio . com INTELLIGENTCIO APAC 35